Northampton Massachusetts
Reproduced from a 7" x 4¾" Steel Engraving
from a Drawing by W.H. Bartlett
"AMERICAN SCENERY" or LAND,LAKE , AND RIVER
Published in 1839 by George Virtue, 26 Ivy Lane , London
This is a exact copy of the original 1839 text describing the above Print, from
Volume II "AMERICAN SCENERY" or Land,Lake , and River
Volume II "AMERICAN SCENERY" or Land,
IT is recorded
of the first settlers of Northampton ,
that in the tenth year of their establishment in the wilderness, in 1663, they
paid for the support of a clergyman one hundred and twenty pounds sterling.
According to the change in the value of money, and the circumstances of the
persons who formed the congregation, this sum was equal to at least six times
the amount of the present valuation. In this one fact is to be found a leaven
which has pervaded the town ever since, preserving for its inhabitants the
rigid morality, the religious feeling, and almost the stern manners of the
Puritan pilgrims.
The inflexible
justice practised among such men had its effect on the Indians among whom they
settled; and Northampton ,
in consequence, was one of the last towns affected by the general hostilities
of Philip's war.
In their first
purchases, they secured no less their own rights than the rights of the
natives; and the latter were always considered as having a right to dwell and
hunt in the lands they had sold. In the year 1664, they requested leave of the
settlers to build themselves a fort within the town; and leave was granted on
the following conditions:—
" That the
Indians do not work, game, or carry burdens within the town on the Sabbath; norpowow
here, or anywhere else;
" Nor get
liquor, nor cider, nor get drunk;
" Nor
admit Indians from without the town;
" Nor
break down the fences of the inhabitants;
" Nor let
cattle or swine upon their fields; but go over a stile at one place ;
" Nor
admit among tkem the murderers, Calawane, Wuttowhan, and Pac-quallant;
" Nor
hunt, nor kill cattle, sheep, or swine, with their dogs."
There is in these
conditions an attention to the sobriety and morality of the Indians, which has
been very seldom regarded in compacts with this injured race.
It is
scarcely possible to convey, to a mind that has not reflected on the subject, a
fair idea of the difficulties, hazards, and horrors, that beset the first
adventurers for religious liberty in New England .
Beside all the usual evils of pioneering— the separation from friends, the
hardships, the privations, the loss of all communication with the civilized
world, these settlers had to encounter the most diabolical warfare recorded in
history.
" The
first announcement of an Indian war," says a diffuse writer on this sub*
ject, " is its terrible commencement. In the hour of security and sleep,
when your deadly enemies are supposed to be friends, quietly fishing and
hunting—when they are believed to be far off, and thoughtless of you and yours,
your sleep is suddenly broken by the war-whoop, your house and village set on
fire, your family and friends butchered, and yourself escape only to be carried
into captivity, and wrung with every species of torture. If you go out to the
fields, you may be shot down by an unseen enemy in the woods, or return in the
evening and find your house consumed to ashes, and your family carried into
captivity."
During the
last part of what is called Philip's war, to the Indians' treachery, cruelty,
and cunning, was added the instigation, the sustenance, and the wealth of the
civilized French. A price was paid for English scalps; European officers
planned and assisted to execute schemes of devastation and slaughter; and, in
short, nothing was wanting to develop, in its fullest ferocity, the Indian's
love of blood.
It is curious
to reflect how wide and immortal would have been the fame of the king of the
Wampanoags, had he succeeded, (as he came very near doing,) in exterminating
the Whites, and restoring the land of his forefathers to his subjects and
children. The experiment of settlement would scarcely have been soon repeated;
and, perhaps, to this day, the Indian, confident in his tried strength, would
have possessed and defended the lands from which he has so utterly disappeared;
while the name of Philip would justly have been associated with those of
Gustavus Vasa, and Alfred of England. The difference between him and these
great lights of history, is, that he failed.
No comments:
Post a Comment